SPEM vs. DFEM
SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) and DFEM (Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI, while DFEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional. SPEM is passively managed, while DFEM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPEM returned 18.73%/yr vs 23.24%/yr for DFEM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DFEM.
Performance
SPEM vs. DFEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPEM achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than DFEM's 25.59% return.
SPEM
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
DFEM
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- YTD
- 25.59%
- 6M
- 27.96%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPEM vs. DFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 12.45% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -4.87% |
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 25.59% | 29.51% | 7.53% | 13.91% | -8.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPEM and DFEM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SPEM and DFEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPEM vs. DFEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPEM
DFEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SPEM
DFEM
Financial Services
SPEM
DFEM
Consumer Cyclical
SPEM
DFEM
Industrials
SPEM
DFEM
Basic Materials
SPEM
DFEM
Communication Services
SPEM
DFEM
Energy
SPEM
DFEM
Healthcare
SPEM
DFEM
Consumer Defensive
SPEM
DFEM
Utilities
SPEM
DFEM
Real Estate
SPEM
DFEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPEM vs. DFEM — Risk / Return Rank
SPEM
DFEM
SPEM vs. DFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPEM | DFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 4.18 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 16.33 | -6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPEM | DFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.74 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.92 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
SPEM vs. DFEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPEM drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than DFEM's maximum drawdown of -20.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPEM and DFEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPEM | DFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.41% | -20.82% | -43.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | -12.12% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -18.09% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.28% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -5.03% | -9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.09% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SPEM vs. DFEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) is 5.69%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that SPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPEM | DFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 7.78% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 16.02% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 18.45% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.26% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 17.26% | +1.54% |
SPEM vs. DFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPEM vs. DFEM - Dividend Comparison
SPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than DFEM's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1.82% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.38% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.47% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SPEM and DFEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFEM has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to SPEM (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPEM dropped -64.41% vs DFEM's -20.82%.
On 3-year performance, DFEM leads with 23.24% vs 18.73% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFEM has performed better with a 23.24% return vs 18.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.82% for DFEM.
SPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SPEM and 0.39% for DFEM.
DFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPEM and DFEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer