PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEM vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEM vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 23.75% return.


DFEM

1D
-5.74%
1M
0.43%
YTD
20.81%
6M
21.36%
1Y
41.37%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
10Y*

AVEM

1D
-5.47%
1M
2.36%
YTD
23.75%
6M
24.18%
1Y
46.12%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEM vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
20.81%29.51%7.53%13.91%-9.60%
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
23.75%34.48%7.49%15.30%-5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEM and AVEM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.98

The correlation between DFEM and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEM vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEM
DFEM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEM vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFEMAVEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.53

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

13.36

-0.62

DFEM vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEM and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFEM vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEMAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-36.05%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-13.13%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-18.02%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-5.47%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-10.04%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.46%

-0.20%

Volatility

DFEM vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) have volatilities of 12.01% and 12.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEMAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

12.55%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

20.07%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.16%

22.23%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

18.99%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

20.91%

-2.97%

DFEM vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEM vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than AVEM's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.62%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
1.89%2.32%2.50%2.38%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, DFEM and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVEM has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to DFEM (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEM dropped -20.82% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 3-year performance, AVEM leads with 24.70% vs 21.68% for DFEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, DFEM has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 24.70% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.89% for DFEM.

DFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while AVEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFEM and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEM and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer