PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEM vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 12.96% return.


DFEM

1D
0.43%
1M
-4.27%
6M
6.72%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.40%

AVDV

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.21%
6M
4.97%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
24.60%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.82M$104.24M$85.42M
$43.02M$39.58M$39.86M

DFEM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
14.75%29.51%7.53%13.91%-9.60%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
12.96%49.37%8.67%16.85%-2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEM and AVDV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.74

The correlation between DFEM and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFEM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFEM
AVDV

Technology

40.4%
7.6%

Financial Services

14.8%
13.6%

Industrials

10.6%
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
15.9%

Basic Materials

7.3%
20.3%

Communication Services

5.0%
2.2%

Healthcare

3.6%
2.4%

Energy

3.4%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

1.9%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

DFEM
40.4%
AVDV
7.6%

Financial Services

DFEM
14.8%
AVDV
13.6%

Industrials

DFEM
10.6%
AVDV
22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFEM
7.9%
AVDV
15.9%

Basic Materials

DFEM
7.3%
AVDV
20.3%

Communication Services

DFEM
5.0%
AVDV
2.2%

Healthcare

DFEM
3.6%
AVDV
2.4%

Energy

DFEM
3.4%
AVDV
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFEM
3.3%
AVDV
3.7%

Utilities

DFEM
1.9%
AVDV
1.5%

Real Estate

DFEM
1.7%
AVDV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFEM
DFEM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFEM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFEMAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.64

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

9.60

-2.75

DFEM vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEM and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFEM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEMAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-43.01%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-13.19%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-14.17%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.46%

-3.96%

-6.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-6.71%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

3.63%

+0.56%

Volatility

DFEM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 5.49%. This indicates that DFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEMAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

5.49%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.62%

14.73%

+5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.46%

16.82%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

17.43%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

19.72%

-1.55%

DFEM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than AVDV's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.80%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
1.97%2.32%2.50%2.38%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEM has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEM dropped -20.82% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 24.60% vs 17.44% for DFEM. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 24.60% return vs 17.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.97% for DFEM.

DFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFEM and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEM and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer