PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFEM vs. FNDE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFEM and FNDE is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

DFEM vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.52%
24.09%
DFEM
FNDE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFEM:

0.20

FNDE:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

DFEM:

0.41

FNDE:

0.86

Omega Ratio

DFEM:

1.05

FNDE:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

DFEM:

0.20

FNDE:

0.56

Martin Ratio

DFEM:

0.64

FNDE:

1.57

Ulcer Index

DFEM:

5.67%

FNDE:

6.59%

Daily Std Dev

DFEM:

17.83%

FNDE:

20.22%

Max Drawdown

DFEM:

-20.82%

FNDE:

-43.55%

Current Drawdown

DFEM:

-10.42%

FNDE:

-10.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 0.34% return.


DFEM

YTD

-2.07%

1M

-5.36%

6M

-6.36%

1Y

4.33%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FNDE

YTD

0.34%

1M

-7.37%

6M

-4.42%

1Y

10.65%

5Y*

11.31%

10Y*

4.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFEM vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFEM and FNDE have an expense ratio of 0.39%.


DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
Expense ratio chart for DFEM: current value is 0.39%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DFEM: 0.39%
Expense ratio chart for FNDE: current value is 0.39%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FNDE: 0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFEM vs. FNDE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFEM is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFEM is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFEM is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFEM is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFEM is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFEM is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNDE is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNDE is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNDE is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNDE is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNDE is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNDE is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFEM vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFEM, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
DFEM: 0.20
FNDE: 0.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFEM, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
DFEM: 0.41
FNDE: 0.86
The chart of Omega ratio for DFEM, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
DFEM: 1.05
FNDE: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFEM, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
DFEM: 0.20
FNDE: 0.56
The chart of Martin ratio for DFEM, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
DFEM: 0.64
FNDE: 1.57

The current DFEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the FNDE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEM and FNDE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.20
0.51
DFEM
FNDE

Dividends

DFEM vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison

DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FNDE's 4.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
2.67%2.50%2.38%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF
4.80%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.31%2.49%3.47%3.05%2.05%1.65%2.02%1.36%

Drawdowns

DFEM vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and FNDE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.42%
-10.78%
DFEM
FNDE

Volatility

DFEM vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) have volatilities of 10.73% and 11.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.73%
11.06%
DFEM
FNDE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab