SPDW vs. SFLNX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both funds - SPDW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDW returned 10.64%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for SFLNX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPDW charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.

Performance

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPDW having a 14.86% return and SFLNX slightly lower at 14.44%. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 10.64%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.

SPDW

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 10.64%

SFLNX

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 14.44%
• 6M: 13.87%
• 1Y: 31.60%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	14.86%	34.75%	3.55%	17.81%	-15.98%	11.45%	9.90%	22.41%	-14.22%	25.81%
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	14.44%	17.02%	16.78%	18.16%	-6.89%	31.64%	9.12%	28.91%	-7.43%	17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and SFLNX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.79

The correlation between SPDW and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPDW	SFLNX
Financial Services	22.2%	13.9%
Industrials	18.4%	9.4%
Technology	16.8%	19.0%
Healthcare	7.9%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	9.2%
Basic Materials	7.3%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	7.4%
Energy	4.9%	10.2%
Communication Services	3.9%	10.3%
Utilities	3.0%	3.2%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPDW vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 62
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 63

SFLNX

SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPDW	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.92	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	4.05	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.53	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	5.06	-2.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	19.68	-9.73

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than SFLNX's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and SFLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDW	SFLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.02%	-56.18%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.55%	-6.10%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.53%	-16.27%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.21%	-18.98%	-11.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.98%	-37.59%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-0.73%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.89%	-6.00%	-6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	1.57%	+1.42%

Volatility

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 3.17%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDW	SFLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	3.17%	+3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	7.81%	+6.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.51%	10.59%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.66%	15.30%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	18.41%	-1.10%

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPDW vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	1.46%	1.68%	1.78%	1.86%	2.09%	4.78%	6.17%	5.33%	9.69%	3.28%	7.23%	5.68%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	2.87%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDW and SFLNX in my portfolio?

SPDW and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDW or SFLNX?

SPDW has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SFLNX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.