PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. IQSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. IQSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly higher than IQSI's 9.26% return.


SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%

IQSI

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.63%
YTD
9.26%
6M
11.32%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. IQSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%0.55%
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
9.26%26.95%4.84%16.21%-14.76%12.70%10.36%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and IQSI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.96

The correlation between SPDW and IQSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDW vs. IQSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
IQSI

Financial Services

22.9%
22.2%

Industrials

19.2%
16.8%

Technology

13.7%
15.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
7.6%

Basic Materials

7.3%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
6.0%

Energy

5.5%
0.9%

Communication Services

3.8%
4.1%

Utilities

3.3%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.3%

Financial Services

SPDW
22.9%
IQSI
22.2%

Industrials

SPDW
19.2%
IQSI
16.8%

Technology

SPDW
13.7%
IQSI
15.9%

Healthcare

SPDW
8.3%
IQSI
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
IQSI
7.6%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
IQSI
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.7%
IQSI
6.0%

Energy

SPDW
5.5%
IQSI
0.9%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.8%
IQSI
4.1%

Utilities

SPDW
3.3%
IQSI
4.0%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.5%
IQSI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. IQSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IQSI
IQSI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IQSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. IQSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDWIQSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.62

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

5.94

+4.99

SPDW vs. IQSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the IQSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and IQSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDWIQSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.28

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.50

-0.26

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. IQSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than IQSI's maximum drawdown of -31.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and IQSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWIQSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-31.90%

-28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-12.00%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-14.02%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-29.86%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-1.14%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-6.50%

-6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.27%

-0.32%

Volatility

SPDW vs. IQSI - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF (IQSI) at 4.89%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWIQSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

4.89%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

12.58%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

15.22%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.32%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

19.00%

-1.74%

SPDW vs. IQSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IQSI's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPDW vs. IQSI - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than IQSI's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
2.50%2.75%2.79%2.98%2.89%2.75%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPDW and IQSI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IQSI (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs IQSI's -31.90%.

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 9.38% vs 7.66% for IQSI. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IQSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IQSI.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.50% for IQSI.

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while IQSI tracks IQ Candriam ESG International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.15% for IQSI.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and IQSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer