PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDW achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 16.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 10.02%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
0.56%
1M
0.54%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
30.58%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.02%
ALL TIME*
5.12%

IDOG

1D
0.05%
1M
5.40%
6M
10.61%
YTD
16.40%
1Y
34.66%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
10.94%
ALL TIME*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.71M$1.45M$1.24M
$136.01M$160.57M$162.83M

SPDW vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
14.95%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
16.40%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and IDOG is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2013

0.89

The correlation between SPDW and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDW vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
IDOG

Financial Services

18.0%
10.6%

Industrials

10.6%
12.3%

Technology

9.5%
7.7%

Healthcare

6.3%
10.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.1%

Energy

4.9%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
10.3%

Communication Services

1.8%
9.5%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.4%
10.2%

Financial Services

SPDW
18.0%
IDOG
10.6%

Industrials

SPDW
10.6%
IDOG
12.3%

Technology

SPDW
9.5%
IDOG
7.7%

Healthcare

SPDW
6.3%
IDOG
10.4%

Basic Materials

SPDW
5.4%
IDOG
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
5.2%
IDOG
10.1%

Energy

SPDW
4.9%
IDOG
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
3.0%
IDOG
10.3%

Communication Services

SPDW
1.8%
IDOG
9.5%

Real Estate

SPDW
1.8%
IDOG

-

Utilities

SPDW
1.4%
IDOG
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDW vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDWIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

5.38

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

16.68

-6.64

SPDW vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-37.32%

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-6.47%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-13.92%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-25.31%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-37.32%

+2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.27%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-7.86%

-4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.08%

+0.97%

Volatility

SPDW vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 2.79%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

2.79%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.15%

10.78%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

13.36%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

15.64%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

17.09%

+0.04%

SPDW vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDW vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than IDOG's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.23%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
3.01%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDW and IDOG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to IDOG (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.94% vs 10.02% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.94% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 3.01% for SPDW.

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer