PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDW vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDW vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPDW having a 15.36% return and IDOG slightly lower at 15.01%. Over the past 10 years, SPDW has underperformed IDOG with an annualized return of 10.05%, while IDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.


SPDW

1D
0.31%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.36%
6M
18.10%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
10.05%

IDOG

1D
0.86%
1M
2.90%
YTD
15.01%
6M
17.85%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDW vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.36%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
15.01%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDW and IDOG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.90

The correlation between SPDW and IDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPDW vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDW
IDOG

Financial Services

22.9%
11.0%

Industrials

19.2%
11.7%

Technology

13.7%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.5%

Basic Materials

7.3%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
9.4%

Energy

5.5%
10.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
9.9%

Utilities

3.3%
10.0%

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Financial Services

SPDW
22.9%
IDOG
11.0%

Industrials

SPDW
19.2%
IDOG
11.7%

Technology

SPDW
13.7%
IDOG
8.5%

Healthcare

SPDW
8.3%
IDOG
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDW
7.8%
IDOG
9.5%

Basic Materials

SPDW
7.3%
IDOG
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPDW
5.7%
IDOG
9.4%

Energy

SPDW
5.5%
IDOG
10.7%

Communication Services

SPDW
3.8%
IDOG
9.9%

Utilities

SPDW
3.3%
IDOG
10.0%

Real Estate

SPDW
2.5%
IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDW vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDW vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDWIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.62

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

19.69

-8.85

SPDW vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDW Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDW and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDWIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.73

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.52

-0.28

Drawdowns

SPDW vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDW drawdown since its inception was -60.02%, which is greater than IDOG's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDW and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDWIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.02%

-37.32%

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-6.47%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-13.92%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

-25.31%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

-37.32%

+2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-7.93%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.84%

+1.11%

Volatility

SPDW vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) at 4.06%. This indicates that SPDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDWIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

4.06%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

10.12%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.58%

13.31%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

15.61%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.45%

-0.20%

SPDW vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDW has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDW vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than IDOG's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.39%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.86%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDW and IDOG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to IDOG (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDW dropped -60.02% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 11.00% vs 10.05% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.86% for SPDW.

SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, while IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPDW and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDW and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer