PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDOG vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDOG vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDOG achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 11.26%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.


IDOG

1D
-0.39%
1M
-3.26%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.27%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
11.26%

DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDOG vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
10.07%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IDOG and DGRW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2013

0.69

The correlation between IDOG and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDOG vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDOG
DGRW

Industrials

12.2%
9.9%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.3%

Basic Materials

10.2%
3.3%

Energy

10.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.1%

Utilities

9.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
6.7%

Technology

9.1%
32.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IDOG
12.2%
DGRW
9.9%

Financial Services

IDOG
11.3%
DGRW
11.3%

Basic Materials

IDOG
10.2%
DGRW
3.3%

Energy

IDOG
10.1%
DGRW
5.0%

Communication Services

IDOG
9.8%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IDOG
9.6%
DGRW
7.1%

Utilities

IDOG
9.6%
DGRW
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

IDOG
9.1%
DGRW
6.7%

Technology

IDOG
9.1%
DGRW
32.1%

Healthcare

IDOG
8.9%
DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

IDOG

-

DGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDOG vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDOG vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDOGDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.30

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

2.04

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

8.67

+7.30

IDOG vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDOG and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDOG vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDOGDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-32.04%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.30%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-16.21%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-17.27%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-32.04%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-3.32%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-3.01%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.95%

-0.04%

Volatility

IDOG vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.75%. This indicates that IDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDOGDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

3.75%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

8.26%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

10.30%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

14.01%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.21%

+0.97%

IDOG vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDOG vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than DGRW's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
4.47%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDOG and DGRW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDOG has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to DGRW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.14% vs 11.26% for IDOG. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 11.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

IDOG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.28% for DGRW.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDOG and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer