PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPDV having a 19.29% return and SPHB slightly higher at 19.95%.


SPDV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.78%
6M
13.02%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.72%

SPHB

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.41%
6M
15.81%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
39.56%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
17.94%
ALL TIME*
13.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$807.83K$592.31K$401.15K
$46.45M$55.30M$54.87M

SPDV vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
19.29%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%4.64%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
19.95%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%25.56%33.96%-15.55%3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and SPHB is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and SPHB has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPDV vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
SPHB

Consumer Cyclical

14.9%
10.6%

Technology

12.1%
45.0%

Real Estate

10.6%

-

Healthcare

10.4%
5.9%

Financial Services

10.2%
14.9%

Energy

8.8%
0.8%

Industrials

8.4%
13.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
0.9%

Communication Services

7.1%
1.6%

Utilities

5.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
14.9%
SPHB
10.6%

Technology

SPDV
12.1%
SPHB
45.0%

Real Estate

SPDV
10.6%
SPHB

-

Healthcare

SPDV
10.4%
SPHB
5.9%

Financial Services

SPDV
10.2%
SPHB
14.9%

Energy

SPDV
8.8%
SPHB
0.8%

Industrials

SPDV
8.4%
SPHB
13.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
7.8%
SPHB
0.9%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.1%
SPHB
1.6%

Utilities

SPDV
5.7%
SPHB
3.5%

Basic Materials

SPDV
4.1%
SPHB
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDV vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDVSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.63

+2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

9.86

+5.21

SPDV vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-46.84%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-14.11%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-29.21%

+10.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-31.49%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-10.79%

+9.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-8.47%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.76%

-1.84%

Volatility

SPDV vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 3.72%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

9.30%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

21.54%

-13.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

26.09%

-13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

27.84%

-11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

28.57%

-8.37%

SPDV vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than SPHB's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.23%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.58%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and SPHB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to SPDV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 14.83% vs 10.42% for SPDV. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while SPHB is S&P 500. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer