SPDV vs. SPHB
SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and SPHB (Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while SPHB is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 10.42%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for SPHB. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPHB.
Performance
SPDV vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPDV having a 19.29% return and SPHB slightly higher at 19.95%.
SPDV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 30.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.72%
SPHB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 1Y
- 39.56%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $807.83K | $592.31K | $401.15K | |
| $46.45M | $55.30M | $54.87M |
SPDV vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 19.29% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 29.54% | -6.09% | 20.46% | -6.59% | 4.64% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 19.95% | 32.87% | 8.48% | 33.28% | -20.59% | 40.58% | 25.56% | 33.96% | -15.55% | 3.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDV and SPHB is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and SPHB has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPDV vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDV
SPHB
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
SPDV
SPHB
Technology
SPDV
SPHB
Real Estate
SPDV
SPHB
-
Healthcare
SPDV
SPHB
Financial Services
SPDV
SPHB
Energy
SPDV
SPHB
Industrials
SPDV
SPHB
Consumer Defensive
SPDV
SPHB
Communication Services
SPDV
SPHB
Utilities
SPDV
SPHB
Basic Materials
SPDV
SPHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDV vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank
SPDV
SPHB
SPDV vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.63 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | 9.86 | +5.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDV vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and SPHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -46.84% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -14.11% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -29.21% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -31.49% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -10.79% | +9.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -8.47% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 3.76% | -1.84% |
Volatility
SPDV vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 3.72%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDV | SPHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 9.30% | -5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 21.54% | -13.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 26.09% | -13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 27.84% | -11.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 28.57% | -8.37% |
SPDV vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDV vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison
SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than SPHB's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.23% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHB Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | 0.58% | 0.60% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.91% | 1.90% | 1.26% | 1.96% | 1.34% | 0.93% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDV and SPHB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHB has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to SPDV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs SPHB's -46.84%.
On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 14.83% vs 10.42% for SPDV. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.
SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.58% for SPHB.
SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while SPHB is S&P 500. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.25% for SPHB.
SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDV and SPHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer