SPDV vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 8.17%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

SPDV vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 14.19% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 9.70% return.

SPDV

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 14.19%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: 27.39%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —

RSP

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 10.18%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDV vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	14.19%	10.90%	14.40%	5.45%	-2.27%	29.54%	-6.09%	20.46%	-6.59%	3.65%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	9.70%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and RSP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017	0.89

The correlation between SPDV and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDV vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPDV	RSP
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	9.9%
Energy	12.3%	4.5%
Technology	11.1%	19.6%
Healthcare	9.7%	11.0%
Financial Services	9.2%	14.5%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	6.5%
Real Estate	8.7%	6.0%
Industrials	7.8%	14.1%
Communication Services	7.8%	3.7%
Utilities	5.8%	6.1%
Basic Materials	5.1%	4.1%

Return for Risk

SPDV vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDV

SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDV vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPDV	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.70	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.47	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.30	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.74	2.49	+2.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.66	9.48	+4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPDV vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPDV	RSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	1.70	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.52	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.57	-0.11

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDV	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.81%	-59.92%	+16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.80%	-7.85%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.62%	-17.81%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.31%	-21.38%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.38%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-6.65%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.06%	-0.05%

Volatility

SPDV vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDV	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	2.56%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	8.29%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.18%	11.56%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.30%	16.18%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.31%	18.35%	+1.96%

SPDV vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPDV vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF	3.31%	3.85%	3.54%	3.95%	3.73%	3.08%	3.90%	3.54%	3.63%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDV and RSP in my portfolio?

SPDV and RSP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDV or RSP?

SPDV has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, SPDV or RSP?

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.33% vs 8.17% for SPDV. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDV or RSP?

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDV or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SPDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDV or RSP?

SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

What is the main difference between SPDV and RSP?

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while RSP is S&P 500. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.