PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDV vs. RDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPDV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPDV achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 22.74% return.


SPDV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.78%
6M
13.02%
YTD
19.29%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.72%

RDIV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.60%
6M
17.44%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.34M$2.84M$4.35M
$807.83K$592.31K$401.15K

SPDV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
19.29%10.90%14.40%5.45%-2.27%29.54%-6.09%20.46%-6.59%4.64%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
22.74%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDV and RDIV is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.90

The correlation between SPDV and RDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPDV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPDV
RDIV

Consumer Cyclical

14.9%
14.5%

Technology

12.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

10.6%
7.6%

Healthcare

10.4%
6.8%

Financial Services

10.2%
19.2%

Energy

8.8%
17.0%

Industrials

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
15.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
8.0%

Utilities

5.7%
6.4%

Basic Materials

4.1%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPDV
14.9%
RDIV
14.5%

Technology

SPDV
12.1%
RDIV
5.1%

Real Estate

SPDV
10.6%
RDIV
7.6%

Healthcare

SPDV
10.4%
RDIV
6.8%

Financial Services

SPDV
10.2%
RDIV
19.2%

Energy

SPDV
8.8%
RDIV
17.0%

Industrials

SPDV
8.4%
RDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

SPDV
7.8%
RDIV
15.4%

Communication Services

SPDV
7.1%
RDIV
8.0%

Utilities

SPDV
5.7%
RDIV
6.4%

Basic Materials

SPDV
4.1%
RDIV
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPDV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPDV
SPDV Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPDV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPDVRDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

7.24

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

22.00

-6.93

SPDV vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDV and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPDV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and RDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDVRDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.81%

-49.97%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-4.84%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-17.91%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.31%

-24.89%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.46%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.46%

-5.80%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.59%

+0.33%

Volatility

SPDV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) is 3.72%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that SPDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDVRDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.00%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

9.25%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

13.49%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

17.41%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.20%

21.85%

-1.65%

SPDV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPDV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than RDIV's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.45%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
SPDV
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
3.23%3.85%3.54%3.95%3.73%3.08%3.90%3.54%3.63%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPDV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SPDV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 13.86% vs 10.42% for SPDV. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 3.23% for SPDV.

SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while RDIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend & Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPDV and RDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer