SPDV vs. DFND
SPDV (AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDV is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPDV returned 8.17%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDV charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
SPDV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPDV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 14.19%
- 6M
- 14.91%
- 1Y
- 27.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
SPDV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 14.19% | 10.90% | 14.40% | 5.45% | -2.27% | 29.54% | -6.09% | 20.46% | -6.59% | 3.65% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDV and DFND is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPDV and DFND has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPDV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPDV
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
SPDV
DFND
Energy
SPDV
DFND
Technology
SPDV
DFND
Healthcare
SPDV
DFND
Financial Services
SPDV
DFND
Consumer Defensive
SPDV
DFND
Real Estate
SPDV
DFND
Industrials
SPDV
DFND
Communication Services
SPDV
DFND
Utilities
SPDV
DFND
-
Basic Materials
SPDV
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
SPDV
DFND
SPDV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 0.02 | +2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 0.11 | +3.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.02 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 0.07 | +4.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 0.13 | +13.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.02 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.21 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SPDV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDV drawdown since its inception was -43.81%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDV and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.81% | -22.65% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -3.44% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.62% | -12.56% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -22.65% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -3.69% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -5.70% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.70% | -1.69% |
Volatility
SPDV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF (SPDV) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that SPDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 0.00% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 6.16% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 10.92% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 22.46% | -6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 19.09% | +1.22% |
SPDV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
SPDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
SPDV AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF | 3.31% | 3.85% | 3.54% | 3.95% | 3.73% | 3.08% | 3.90% | 3.54% | 3.63% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDV and DFND have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPDV has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDV dropped -43.81% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 5-year performance, SPDV leads with 8.17% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, SPDV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPDV has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
SPDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
SPDV is categorized as Dividend, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPDV tracks S&P 500 Dividend and Free Cash Flow Yield Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Advisors Asset Management and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SPDV and 1.50% for DFND.
SPDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDV and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer