SPDN vs. TMF
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDN is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDN returned -12.18%/yr vs -18.47%/yr for TMF. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
SPDN vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDN has outperformed TMF with an annualized return of -12.18%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively lower -18.47% annualized return.
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -12.79%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- -12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.21%
TMF
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- 6M
- -15.79%
- YTD
- -16.67%
- 1Y
- -18.44%
- 3Y*
- -20.63%
- 5Y*
- -34.74%
- 10Y*
- -18.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $433.42M | $387.95M | $422.31M | |
| $161.82M | $130.43M | $127.82M |
SPDN vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.42% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 18.63% | -23.72% | -24.56% | -21.94% | 5.41% | -17.16% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -16.67% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and TMF is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016 | 0.08 |
The correlation between SPDN and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
TMF
SPDN vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDN | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.93 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.53 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | -1.07 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -93.10% | +17.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -28.69% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -50.64% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | -89.14% | +45.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.97% | -93.10% | +19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.80% | -93.10% | +18.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.93% | -44.07% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 14.10% | -5.20% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 3.55%, while Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 7.21% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 19.98% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 27.35% | -14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 46.36% | -29.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 43.70% | -25.67% |
SPDN vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than TMF's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.32% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.74% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPDN and TMF have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs TMF's -93.10%.
On 10-year performance, SPDN leads with -12.18% vs -18.47% for TMF. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -12.18% return vs -18.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.32% for SPDN.
SPDN is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index, while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer