SPDN vs. PSQ
SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both Inverse Equities funds - SPDN tracks the S&P 500 Index while PSQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPDN returned -12.18%/yr vs -18.20%/yr for PSQ. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPDN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PSQ.
Performance
SPDN vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPDN achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SPDN has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of -12.18%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -18.20% annualized return.
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -12.79%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- -12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.21%
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- -17.36%
- 3Y*
- -15.05%
- 5Y*
- -11.74%
- 10Y*
- -18.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -16.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $270.27M | $217.80M | $219.49M | |
| $433.42M | $387.95M | $422.31M |
SPDN vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.42% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -15.04% | 18.63% | -23.72% | -24.56% | -21.94% | 5.41% | -17.16% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -9.94% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPDN and PSQ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPDN and PSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPDN vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPDN
PSQ
SPDN vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPDN | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.63 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | -1.23 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPDN vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPDN drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDN and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPDN | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -98.26% | +22.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.93% | -24.83% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -49.65% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.85% | -60.91% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.97% | -87.66% | +13.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.80% | -98.12% | +23.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.93% | -74.15% | +25.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.90% | 12.73% | -3.83% |
Volatility
SPDN vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) is 3.55%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that SPDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPDN | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 6.96% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 16.03% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 19.38% | -6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 22.93% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 22.46% | -4.43% |
SPDN vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPDN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPDN vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
SPDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than PSQ's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.26% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.32% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPDN and PSQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PSQ has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDN dropped -75.31% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPDN leads with -12.18% vs -18.20% for PSQ. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -12.18% return vs -18.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.32% for SPDN.
SPDN tracks S&P 500 Index, while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SPDN and 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPDN and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer