SPDG vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SPDG (SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPDG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPDG returned 28.62% vs 0.20% for DFND. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPDG charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

SPDG vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPDG

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 16.41%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPDG vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	16.69%	11.66%	20.22%	8.14%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and DFND is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023	0.15

SPDG vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPDG	DFND
Technology	35.5%	24.8%
Financial Services	12.9%	18.2%
Communication Services	10.5%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	3.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	10.7%
Industrials	8.5%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.2%
Energy	3.3%	1.7%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.4%	4.3%

Return for Risk

SPDG vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG

SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPDG	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	0.02	+2.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	0.11	+3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.02	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	0.07	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.57	0.13	+11.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPDG vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPDG	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	0.02	+2.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	0.36	+1.16

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPDG	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.67%	-22.65%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	-3.44%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-3.69%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-5.70%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	3.70%	-1.22%

Volatility

SPDG vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that SPDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPDG	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	0.00%	+3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	6.16%	+3.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.14%	10.92%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.18%	22.46%	-8.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	19.09%	-4.91%

SPDG vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPDG vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
SPDG SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF	2.59%	2.87%	2.61%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPDG and DFND in my portfolio?

SPDG and DFND have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPDG or DFND?

SPDG has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPDG dropped -15.67% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, SPDG or DFND?

On 1-year performance, SPDG leads with 28.62% vs 0.20% for DFND. On fees, SPDG is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPDG or DFND?

Over the 1-year period, SPDG has performed better with a 28.62% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPDG or DFND?

SPDG is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPDG or DFND?

SPDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between SPDG and DFND?

SPDG is categorized as Dividend, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPDG tracks S&P Sector-Neutral High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPDG and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.