PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPDG vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SPDG vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SPDG vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.97%11.66%20.22%8.14%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%-0.14%

Returns By Period


SPDG

1D
1.61%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
2.97%
6M
5.24%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
1.22%
1Y
6.91%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SPDG vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPDG has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SPDG vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPDG
SPDG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SPDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPDG vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDGDFNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.46

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

0.81

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

-0.05

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

-0.12

+5.03

SPDG vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPDG and DFND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDGDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.46

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.36

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between SPDG and DFND is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SPDG vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

SPDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPDG
SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF
2.94%2.87%2.61%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%

Drawdowns

SPDG vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPDG drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPDG and DFND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDGDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-22.65%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-7.48%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-3.69%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-5.73%

+3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.80%

-0.75%

Volatility

SPDG vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P Sector Neutral Dividend ETF (SPDG) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that SPDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SPDGDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

0.00%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

8.52%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

17.95%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

22.58%

-8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

19.15%

-4.94%