SPD vs. SDMF
SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) and SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index. SPD is actively managed, while SDMF is passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPD charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDMF.
Performance
SPD vs. SDMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SPD
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPD vs. SDMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF | 7.98% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPD and SDMF is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPD vs. SDMF — Risk / Return Rank
SPD
SDMF
SPD vs. SDMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPD | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPD | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.91 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SPD vs. SDMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, which is greater than SDMF's maximum drawdown of -6.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and SDMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPD | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -6.23% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -2.29% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility
SPD vs. SDMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPD | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 13.36% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 13.36% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 13.36% | +2.62% |
SPD vs. SDMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPD has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPD vs. SDMF - Dividend Comparison
SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF | 0.96% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 1.91% | 1.64% | 0.88% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPD and SDMF have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPD.
SPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SPD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SDMF is Systematic Trend. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPD and 0.35% for SDMF.
Find the right allocation for SPD and SDMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer