SDMF vs. GXDW
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and GXDW (Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds - SDMF tracks the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index while GXDW tracks the Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GXDW.
Performance
SDMF vs. GXDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXDW
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- 13.19%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- -10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF vs. GXDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.56% |
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 14.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and GXDW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. GXDW — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GXDW
SDMF vs. GXDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDMF | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. GXDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum GXDW drawdown of -67.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and GXDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -67.81% | +61.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -55.26% | +52.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -43.15% | +40.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.60% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. GXDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | GXDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 28.39% | -15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 28.18% | -15.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.16% | 29.87% | -16.71% |
SDMF vs. GXDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GXDW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. GXDW - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 0.31% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and GXDW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GXDW.
GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SDMF tracks DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while GXDW tracks Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.50% for GXDW.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and GXDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer