SPD vs. SPUC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) and SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPD returned 8.57%/yr vs 14.01%/yr for SPUC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.53% expense ratio.

Performance

SPD vs. SPUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPD achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPUC's 9.77% return.

SPD

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 16.00%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: —

SPUC

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 9.77%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: 14.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPD vs. SPUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	7.45%	18.86%	17.49%	20.94%	-25.96%	24.81%	8.75%
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF	9.77%	22.64%	25.37%	27.50%	-24.76%	33.71%	9.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SPD and SPUC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020	0.91

The correlation between SPD and SPUC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPD vs. SPUC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPD	SPUC
Technology	35.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.9%
Communication Services	11.2%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

SPD vs. SPUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPD

SPD Risk / Return Rank: 31
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SPUC

SPUC Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SPUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
SPUC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SPUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPUC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPD vs. SPUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPD	SPUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.87	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.45	-0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.32	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	2.78	-1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	9.40	-5.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPD vs. SPUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the SPUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPD and SPUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPD	SPUC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.87	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.64	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.76	-0.07

Drawdowns

SPD vs. SPUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, smaller than the maximum SPUC drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and SPUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPD	SPUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.38%	-29.20%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.90%	-11.56%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-28.17%	+12.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.38%	-29.20%	+1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.72%	-8.49%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.42%	+0.40%

Volatility

SPD vs. SPUC - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) at 2.66%. This indicates that SPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPD	SPUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.66%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.59%	10.87%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.20%	16.84%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	21.95%	-5.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.98%	21.47%	-5.49%

SPD vs. SPUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPD and SPUC have an expense ratio of 0.53%.

Dividends

SPD vs. SPUC - Dividend Comparison

SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SPUC's 9.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	0.95%	0.97%	1.14%	1.91%	1.64%	0.88%	0.43%
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF	9.15%	7.70%	0.94%	1.33%	1.53%	2.00%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPD and SPUC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SPD and SPUC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPD or SPUC?

SPD has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to SPUC (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPD dropped -27.38% vs SPUC's -29.20%.

Which ETF is better, SPD or SPUC?

On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 14.01% vs 8.57% for SPD. Both ETFs have the same 0.53% expense ratio. On volatility, SPUC has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPD or SPUC?

Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 14.01% return vs 8.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPD or SPUC?

SPD and SPUC have the same expense ratio: 0.53% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPD or SPUC?

SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 0.95% for SPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.