PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPD vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPD vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPD achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 8.54% return.


SPD

1D
0.07%
1M
5.23%
YTD
7.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*

RYLD

1D
0.13%
1M
2.91%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.63%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPD vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
7.45%18.86%17.49%20.94%-25.96%24.81%8.75%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
8.54%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPD and RYLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020

0.69

The correlation between SPD and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPD vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPD
RYLD

Technology

35.6%
16.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
104.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.5%

Industrials

8.3%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
2.4%

Energy

3.5%
6.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.8%

Technology

SPD
35.6%
RYLD
16.8%

Financial Services

SPD
11.8%
RYLD
104.9%

Communication Services

SPD
11.2%
RYLD
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPD
10.1%
RYLD
8.4%

Healthcare

SPD
8.5%
RYLD
16.5%

Industrials

SPD
8.3%
RYLD
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

SPD
4.9%
RYLD
2.4%

Energy

SPD
3.5%
RYLD
6.2%

Utilities

SPD
2.4%
RYLD
2.9%

Real Estate

SPD
1.9%
RYLD
6.2%

Basic Materials

SPD
1.8%
RYLD
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPD vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPD
SPD Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPD vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPDRYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

2.14

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

3.00

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.62

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

14.68

-10.42

SPD vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPD and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPDRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.14

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.20

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.32

+0.38

Drawdowns

SPD vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and RYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPDRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.38%

-41.53%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-6.29%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-19.05%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.38%

-21.33%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-8.85%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

1.55%

+2.27%

Volatility

SPD vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.00%. This indicates that SPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPDRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.00%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

7.60%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

10.66%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

14.03%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

17.21%

-1.23%

SPD vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPD has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPD vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than RYLD's 11.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.63%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%
SPD
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF
0.95%0.97%1.14%1.91%1.64%0.88%0.43%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPD and RYLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPD has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to RYLD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPD dropped -27.38% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

On 5-year performance, SPD leads with 8.57% vs 2.80% for RYLD. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPD has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.63%, compared with 0.95% for SPD.

SPD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPD and 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPD and RYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer