SPD vs. FTIF
SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPD is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPD returned 16.41%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for FTIF. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SPD charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
SPD vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPD achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 23.66% return.
SPD
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.56%
FTIF
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.66%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $97.77K | $75.15K | $62.02K | |
| $297.15K | $312.14K | $351.11K |
SPD vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF | 7.33% | 18.86% | 17.49% | 20.41% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 23.66% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPD and FTIF is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SPD and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPD vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPD
FTIF
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPD
FTIF
Financial Services
SPD
FTIF
-
Communication Services
SPD
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPD
FTIF
Healthcare
SPD
FTIF
-
Industrials
SPD
FTIF
Consumer Defensive
SPD
FTIF
-
Energy
SPD
FTIF
Utilities
SPD
FTIF
-
Real Estate
SPD
FTIF
Basic Materials
SPD
FTIF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPD vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
SPD
FTIF
SPD vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 5.31 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 15.40 | -11.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPD vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPD drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPD and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -27.83% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -6.34% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -27.83% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.20% | +2.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -5.90% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.18% | +1.59% |
Volatility
SPD vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 2.78%. This indicates that SPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPD | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.78% | +1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 10.50% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 14.85% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 18.72% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 18.72% | -2.77% |
SPD vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPD has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPD vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
SPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than FTIF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.08% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 1.91% | 1.64% | 0.88% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPD and FTIF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPD has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to FTIF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPD dropped -27.38% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, SPD leads with 16.41% vs 11.08% for FTIF. On fees, SPD is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPD has performed better with a 16.41% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPD is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.95% for SPD.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPD and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPD and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer