SOYB vs. HG=F
SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while HG=F (Copper) is an asset. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SOYB vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SOYB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 11.25%
- 3Y*
- -2.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.20%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOYB vs. HG=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 10.38% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 15.81% |
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB and HG=F is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB vs. HG=F — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB
HG=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOYB vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOYB | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOYB vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.67% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | — | — |
Volatility
SOYB vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB | HG=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB and HG=F have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SOYB and HG=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer