HG=F vs. FCX
HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HG=F vs. FCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCX
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 21.52%
- 1Y
- 52.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 21.17%
HG=F vs. FCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
FCX Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 24.23% | 35.41% | -9.41% | 13.69% | 6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between HG=F and FCX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HG=F vs. FCX — Risk / Return Rank
HG=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FCX
HG=F vs. FCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HG=F | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HG=F vs. FCX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HG=F | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -92.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.44% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.58% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.06% | — |
Volatility
HG=F vs. FCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HG=F | FCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 49.47% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 45.18% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 48.54% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
HG=F and FCX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HG=F and FCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer