HG=F vs. COPX
HG=F (Copper) is an asset, while COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) is Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HG=F vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HG=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 83.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 20.79%
HG=F vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HG=F Copper | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 6.53% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HG=F and COPX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HG=F vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
HG=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPX
HG=F vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HG=F | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HG=F vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HG=F | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -83.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -20.08% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -39.23% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility
HG=F vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HG=F | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 44.69% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 37.09% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 35.76% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
HG=F and COPX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HG=F and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer