PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HG=F vs. BZ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HG=F and BZ=F is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

HG=F vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copper (HG=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.63%
-4.81%
HG=F
BZ=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HG=F:

0.42

BZ=F:

-0.37

Sortino Ratio

HG=F:

0.72

BZ=F:

-0.35

Omega Ratio

HG=F:

1.09

BZ=F:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

HG=F:

0.41

BZ=F:

-0.17

Martin Ratio

HG=F:

0.66

BZ=F:

-0.62

Ulcer Index

HG=F:

14.24%

BZ=F:

14.34%

Daily Std Dev

HG=F:

22.02%

BZ=F:

24.10%

Max Drawdown

HG=F:

-62.54%

BZ=F:

-86.77%

Current Drawdown

HG=F:

-17.02%

BZ=F:

-46.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HG=F achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than BZ=F's 4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HG=F has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 5.38%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower 4.59% annualized return.


HG=F

YTD

5.50%

1M

4.54%

6M

3.64%

1Y

12.07%

5Y*

9.42%

10Y*

5.38%

BZ=F

YTD

4.21%

1M

7.09%

6M

-4.81%

1Y

-2.23%

5Y*

4.81%

10Y*

4.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HG=F vs. BZ=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HG=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HG=F is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HG=F is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BZ=F
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HG=F vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copper (HG=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.15-0.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.500.36-0.35
The chart of Omega ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.050.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.000.14-0.17
The chart of Martin ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.000.22-0.62
HG=F
BZ=F

The current HG=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HG=F and BZ=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.15
-0.36
HG=F
BZ=F

Drawdowns

HG=F vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HG=F drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, smaller than the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HG=F and BZ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-17.02%
-46.76%
HG=F
BZ=F

Volatility

HG=F vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Copper (HG=F) is 4.92%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that HG=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.92%
6.21%
HG=F
BZ=F
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab