SOYB vs. EMNT
SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOYB is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while EMNT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. SOYB is passively managed, while EMNT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOYB returned -0.14%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for EMNT. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EMNT.
Performance
SOYB vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than EMNT's 1.68% return.
SOYB
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- 11.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.50%
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
SOYB vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 10.66% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | 3.97% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 1.68% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | 0.11% | 2.08% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB and EMNT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019 | -0.03 |
The correlation between SOYB and EMNT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB
EMNT
SOYB vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOYB | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -19.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 5.62 | -4.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 33.33 | -31.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 235.13 | -231.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOYB | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 10.62 | -9.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 4.19 | -4.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 3.52 | -3.52 |
Drawdowns
SOYB vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and EMNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.76% | -2.28% | -51.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -0.13% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | -0.73% | -30.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -1.70% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.47% | 0.00% | -17.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.76% | -0.23% | -25.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 0.02% | +3.56% |
Volatility
SOYB vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) at 0.13%. This indicates that SOYB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 0.13% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 0.35% | +8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 0.41% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 0.83% | +17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 0.86% | +16.13% |
SOYB vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOYB vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
SOYB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.00% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% |
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB and EMNT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOYB has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to EMNT (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs EMNT's -2.28%.
On 5-year performance, EMNT leads with 3.44% vs -0.14% for SOYB. On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EMNT has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMNT has performed better with a 3.44% return vs -0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
EMNT has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 0.00% for SOYB.
SOYB is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while EMNT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.24% for EMNT.
EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.62 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOYB and EMNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer