SOXS vs. TMF
SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X) are both exchange-traded funds - SOXS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOXS returned -78.81%/yr vs -16.47%/yr for TMF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for TMF.
Performance
SOXS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOXS achieves a -91.68% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SOXS has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -78.81%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -16.47% annualized return.
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- -20.47%
- 5Y*
- -29.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
SOXS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | -5.05% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOXS and TMF is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2010 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SOXS and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOXS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
SOXS
TMF
SOXS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SOXS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | 0.06 | -1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.97 | 0.29 | -4.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.58 | 1.03 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.04 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | -0.08 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SOXS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 0.06 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | -0.64 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | -0.38 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | -0.13 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
SOXS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOXS and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOXS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -92.89% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.64% | -26.51% | -71.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.79% | -56.31% | -43.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.97% | -88.81% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -92.89% | -7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -92.14% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.60% | -43.62% | -48.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.48% | 11.42% | +59.06% |
Volatility
SOXS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a higher volatility of 44.74% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.30%. This indicates that SOXS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOXS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.74% | 8.30% | +36.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.91% | 19.33% | +64.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.16% | 28.86% | +73.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.22% | 46.75% | +61.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.49% | 43.92% | +56.57% |
SOXS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOXS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.90%, more than TMF's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOXS and TMF have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to TMF (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOXS dropped -100.00% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.47% vs -78.81% for SOXS. On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.47% return vs -78.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TMF.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 4.11% for TMF.
SOXS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%), while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SOXS and 1.09% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOXS and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer