SOCL vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SOCL is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SOCL returned -9.67%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for TDVG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

SOCL vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 8.26% return.

SOCL

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -4.36%
• YTD: -23.22%
• 6M: -22.97%
• 1Y: -20.93%
• 3Y*: 5.38%
• 5Y*: -9.67%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

TDVG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOCL vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF	-23.22%	31.04%	5.08%	31.08%	-42.23%	-12.84%	29.57%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.26%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	26.20%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SOCL and TDVG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.50

The correlation between SOCL and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOCL vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SOCL	TDVG
Communication Services	96.2%	1.0%
Technology	2.8%	26.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	6.9%
Industrials	0.4%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	7.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Energy	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-	19.3%
Healthcare	-	12.4%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

SOCL vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOCL

SOCL Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SOCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOCL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SOCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
SOCL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOCL vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOCL	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	1.75	-2.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	2.51	-3.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.31	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	2.35	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	9.64	-10.87

SOCL vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOCL Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOCL and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOCL vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOCL	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.70%	-19.20%	-49.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.52%	-7.24%	-26.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.52%	-14.02%	-19.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.32%	-19.20%	-47.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.84%	-0.61%	-44.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-3.72%	-18.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.95%	1.76%	+15.19%

Volatility

SOCL vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.70%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOCL	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	2.70%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.15%	7.60%	+11.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.03%	9.76%	+14.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.84%	13.92%	+15.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.60%	13.90%	+13.70%

SOCL vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOCL vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF	0.56%	0.43%	0.25%	0.61%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.49%	0.18%	0.01%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOCL and TDVG in my portfolio?

SOCL and TDVG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOCL or TDVG?

SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to TDVG (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, SOCL or TDVG?

On 5-year performance, TDVG leads with 10.13% vs -9.67% for SOCL. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOCL or TDVG?

Over the 5-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 10.13% return vs -9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOCL or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOCL or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.

What is the main difference between SOCL and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.