SOCL vs. SCHG
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for SCHG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SOCL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.96%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
SOCL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.23% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and SCHG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2011 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SOCL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
SCHG
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
SCHG
Technology
SOCL
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
SCHG
Industrials
SOCL
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
SCHG
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
SCHG
Energy
SOCL
-
SCHG
Financial Services
SOCL
-
SCHG
Healthcare
SOCL
-
SCHG
Real Estate
SOCL
-
SCHG
Utilities
SOCL
-
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
SCHG
SOCL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.18 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.98 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 3.19 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -34.59% | -34.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -16.41% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -23.39% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -34.59% | -31.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -34.59% | -34.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -6.57% | -38.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -5.20% | -16.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 5.03% | +11.92% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.90%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 5.90% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 12.46% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 16.21% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 22.38% | +7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 21.58% | +6.02% |
SOCL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to SCHG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.63% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
SOCL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.04% for SCHG.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer