SOCL vs. ROUS
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SOCL tracks the Solactive Social Media Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.96%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ROUS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
SOCL vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 15.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ROUS with an annualized return of 7.96%, while ROUS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -22.97%
- 1Y
- -20.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.38%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 6M
- 13.68%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
SOCL vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -23.22% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 15.46% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ROUS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SOCL and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
SOCL vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SOCL
ROUS
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
SOCL
ROUS
Technology
SOCL
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
SOCL
ROUS
Industrials
SOCL
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
SOCL
ROUS
Basic Materials
SOCL
-
ROUS
Energy
SOCL
-
ROUS
Financial Services
SOCL
-
ROUS
Healthcare
SOCL
-
ROUS
Real Estate
SOCL
-
ROUS
Utilities
SOCL
-
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ROUS
SOCL vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.40 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 4.47 | -5.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 17.98 | -19.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than ROUS's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -35.51% | -33.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -5.97% | -27.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -15.81% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -18.91% | -47.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -35.51% | -33.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.84% | -1.80% | -43.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.03% | -4.22% | -17.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.95% | 1.48% | +15.47% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 3.85%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 3.85% | +5.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.15% | 8.94% | +10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 11.66% | +12.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.84% | 14.43% | +15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.60% | 16.98% | +10.62% |
SOCL vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ROUS's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.33% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ROUS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to ROUS (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 13.01% vs 7.96% for SOCL. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.56% for SOCL.
SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer