SOCL vs. ENFR
SOCL (Global X Social Media ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SOCL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Social Media Index, while ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOCL returned 7.94%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for ENFR. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SOCL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
SOCL vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -15.30% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 27.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SOCL has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 7.94%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.73% annualized return.
SOCL
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -13.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- -6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.35%
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M | |
| $257.44K | $226.25K | $381.77K |
SOCL vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | -15.30% | 31.04% | 5.08% | 31.08% | -42.23% | -12.84% | 78.35% | 25.74% | -16.39% | 54.65% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOCL and ENFR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SOCL and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOCL vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
SOCL
ENFR
SOCL vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOCL | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.32 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 3.28 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 8.01 | -8.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOCL vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOCL | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -68.28% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.52% | -8.64% | -24.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.52% | -15.58% | -17.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.06% | -20.29% | -43.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.70% | -62.64% | -6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.14% | -3.18% | -35.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.16% | -15.82% | -6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.14% | 3.53% | +15.61% |
Volatility
SOCL vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.48%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOCL | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.48% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.84% | 12.31% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.00% | 15.26% | +9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 19.20% | +10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 24.65% | +3.03% |
SOCL vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOCL vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than ENFR's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
SOCL Global X Social Media ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.61% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SOCL and ENFR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOCL has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to ENFR (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.73% vs 7.94% for SOCL. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.73% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SOCL.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.46% for SOCL.
SOCL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. SOCL tracks Solactive Social Media Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOCL and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer