PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOCL vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOCL vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOCL achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -3.71% return.


SOCL

1D
-2.45%
1M
1.38%
YTD
-14.38%
6M
-14.22%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
-6.44%
10Y*
9.37%

CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOCL vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
-14.38%31.04%5.08%31.08%-42.23%-12.84%78.35%25.74%-16.39%16.66%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-3.71%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SOCL and CCOR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.03

The correlation between SOCL and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SOCL vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SOCL
CCOR

Communication Services

95.9%
8.7%

Technology

3.0%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%
6.8%

Industrials

0.5%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
9.4%

Basic Materials

-

5.1%

Energy

-

7.2%

Financial Services

-

17.7%

Healthcare

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

6.3%

Communication Services

SOCL
95.9%
CCOR
8.7%

Technology

SOCL
3.0%
CCOR
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

SOCL
0.6%
CCOR
6.8%

Industrials

SOCL
0.5%
CCOR
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SOCL
0.1%
CCOR
9.4%

Basic Materials

SOCL

-

CCOR
5.1%

Energy

SOCL

-

CCOR
7.2%

Financial Services

SOCL

-

CCOR
17.7%

Healthcare

SOCL

-

CCOR
10.8%

Real Estate

SOCL

-

CCOR
2.8%

Utilities

SOCL

-

CCOR
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOCL vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOCL
SOCL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SOCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOCL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SOCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOCL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOCL vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SOCLCCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.87

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.69

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

-1.59

+1.60

SOCL vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOCL and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SOCLCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

-0.87

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.23

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.11

+0.21

Drawdowns

SOCL vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOCL drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOCL and CCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOCLCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.70%

-22.99%

-45.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.52%

-8.75%

-24.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.52%

-12.31%

-21.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.32%

-22.99%

-43.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.48%

-20.03%

-18.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-7.29%

-14.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.68%

3.77%

+11.91%

Volatility

SOCL vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that SOCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOCLCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

1.78%

+5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

4.96%

+12.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.24%

6.93%

+16.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.68%

11.10%

+18.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.55%

10.75%

+16.80%

SOCL vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOCL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOCL vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

SOCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
0.50%0.43%0.25%0.61%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.49%0.18%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SOCL and CCOR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOCL has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOCL dropped -68.70% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

On 5-year performance, CCOR leads with -2.56% vs -6.44% for SOCL. On fees, SOCL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CCOR has performed better with a -2.56% return vs -6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOCL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.50% for SOCL.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SOCL and 1.09% for CCOR.

SOCL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOCL and CCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer