PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNY vs. TFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNY vs. TFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sanofi (SNY) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNY achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than TFC's 7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SNY has underperformed TFC with an annualized return of 4.57%, while TFC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.


SNY

1D
0.09%
1M
4.81%
6M
0.09%
YTD
-4.62%
1Y
-5.19%
3Y*
-2.90%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
4.57%
ALL TIME*
5.38%

TFC

1D
0.68%
1M
6.09%
6M
5.57%
YTD
7.30%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
22.23%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
7.72%
ALL TIME*
9.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$142.18M$174.45M$141.08M
$468.16M$447.01M$444.14M

SNY vs. TFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNY
Sanofi
-4.62%4.93%1.09%6.55%0.57%7.00%0.39%20.47%6.06%9.96%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
7.30%19.05%23.72%-8.59%-23.53%26.08%-11.16%34.55%-10.24%8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SNY and TFC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002

0.31

The correlation between SNY and TFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNY:

$105.28B

TFC:

$64.45B

EPS

SNY:

€3.10

TFC:

$4.58

PE Ratio

SNY:

12.39

TFC:

11.28

PS Ratio

SNY:

1.98

TFC:

2.16

PB Ratio

SNY:

1.27

TFC:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNY:

€47.35B

TFC:

$30.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNY:

€34.18B

TFC:

$19.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

SNY:

€12.63B

TFC:

$7.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNY vs. TFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNY
SNY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNY Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

TFC
TFC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNY vs. TFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanofi (SNY) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNYTFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.16

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

0.95

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.55

2.39

-2.94

SNY vs. TFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNY Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the TFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNY and TFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNY vs. TFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNY drawdown since its inception was -46.46%, smaller than the maximum TFC drawdown of -66.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNY and TFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNYTFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.46%

-66.56%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.70%

-20.67%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-26.93%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.52%

-59.11%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

-59.11%

+25.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.77%

-5.39%

-13.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-13.81%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

8.22%

+1.25%

Volatility

SNY vs. TFC - Volatility Comparison

Sanofi (SNY) and Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNYTFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

7.25%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.02%

19.51%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.32%

24.19%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.05%

31.74%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

33.61%

-10.19%

Dividends

SNY vs. TFC - Dividend Comparison

SNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than TFC's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNY
Sanofi
5.53%4.56%4.22%3.83%4.32%3.80%3.61%3.47%4.29%3.82%4.11%3.77%
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
4.02%4.23%4.79%5.63%4.65%3.18%3.76%3.04%3.60%2.53%2.45%2.78%

Financials

SNY vs. TFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanofi and Truist Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
11.24B
7.61B
(SNY) Total Revenue
(TFC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SNY values in EUR, TFC values in USD

SNY vs. TFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sanofi and Truist Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
72.1%
64.0%
Portfolio components
SNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanofi reported a gross profit of 8.11B and revenue of 11.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

TFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.87B and revenue of 7.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.0%.

SNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanofi reported an operating income of 2.27B and revenue of 11.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

TFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

SNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sanofi reported a net income of 1.61B and revenue of 11.24B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.

TFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Truist Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SNY and TFC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNY has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to TFC (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNY dropped -46.46% vs TFC's -66.56%.

TFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNY and TFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer