SNSR vs. SIL
SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNSR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.51%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for SIL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNSR charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
SNSR vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.75% return.
SNSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- YTD
- 44.93%
- 6M
- 43.21%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 91.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
SNSR vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 44.93% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 47.90% | -17.66% | 28.59% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 4.75% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and SIL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.29 |
SNSR vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNSR
SIL
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SNSR
SIL
-
Industrials
SNSR
SIL
-
Healthcare
SNSR
SIL
-
Communication Services
SNSR
SIL
-
Basic Materials
SNSR
SIL
Utilities
SNSR
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SNSR
-
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
SNSR
-
SIL
Energy
SNSR
-
SIL
-
Financial Services
SNSR
-
SIL
-
Real Estate
SNSR
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNSR vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
SNSR
SIL
SNSR vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNSR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.79 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 7.14 | +3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNSR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.83 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.36 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.14 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNSR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -82.99% | +44.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -32.91% | +18.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -32.91% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -55.08% | +17.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -25.87% | +25.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -51.45% | +41.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 12.82% | -8.22% |
Volatility
SNSR vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is 9.35%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that SNSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNSR | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 17.66% | -8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 41.57% | -23.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 50.01% | -26.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 39.21% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 39.60% | -14.93% |
SNSR vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNSR vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SIL's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.13% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNSR and SIL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to SNSR (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 5-year performance, SIL leads with 13.96% vs 9.51% for SNSR. On fees, SIL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SNSR has been the lower-risk option at 9.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIL has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.37% for SNSR.
SNSR is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIL is Silver. SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.65% for SIL.
SNSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNSR and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer