SIL vs. PSLV

In the year-to-date period, SIL achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's 22.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SIL has underperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 3.23%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively higher 4.78% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIL and PSLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SIL drawdown since its inception was -82.99%, roughly equal to the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIL and PSLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a higher volatility of 12.37% compared to Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) at 7.26%. This indicates that SIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.