PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNSR vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNSR vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 31.89% return.


SNSR

1D
-0.45%
1M
19.62%
YTD
44.93%
6M
43.21%
1Y
49.79%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*

FTEC

1D
-1.49%
1M
18.21%
YTD
31.89%
6M
30.74%
1Y
60.87%
3Y*
33.93%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
25.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNSR vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
44.93%6.46%-0.45%23.06%-25.50%23.66%35.05%47.90%-17.66%28.59%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
31.89%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SNSR and FTEC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.79

The correlation between SNSR and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNSR vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNSR
FTEC

Technology

78.7%
98.0%

Industrials

15.7%
0.6%

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Communication Services

0.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

0.2%

-

Utilities

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.4%

Financial Services

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SNSR
78.7%
FTEC
98.0%

Industrials

SNSR
15.7%
FTEC
0.6%

Healthcare

SNSR
4.8%
FTEC

-

Communication Services

SNSR
0.8%
FTEC
0.0%

Basic Materials

SNSR
0.2%
FTEC

-

Utilities

SNSR
0.1%
FTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

SNSR

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

SNSR

-

FTEC

-

Energy

SNSR

-

FTEC
0.4%

Financial Services

SNSR

-

FTEC
0.6%

Real Estate

SNSR

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNSR vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNSR
SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNSR vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNSRFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.76

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

12.10

-1.24

SNSR vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNSR Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNSR and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNSRFTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.97

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.90

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.99

-0.39

Drawdowns

SNSR vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNSRFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-34.95%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-16.26%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.32%

-27.30%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.03%

-34.95%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.49%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-5.56%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

5.05%

-0.45%

Volatility

SNSR vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.43%. This indicates that SNSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNSRFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

6.43%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.55%

16.14%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.90%

20.63%

+3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.16%

25.23%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.67%

24.69%

-0.02%

SNSR vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNSR has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SNSR vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than FTEC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.32%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
0.37%0.54%0.73%0.74%0.82%0.43%0.21%1.12%1.25%1.11%0.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNSR and FTEC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNSR has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 22.49% vs 9.51% for SNSR. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 22.49% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.32% for FTEC.

SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SNSR and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNSR and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer