SNSR vs. DRIV
SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNSR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SNSR returned 9.51%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
SNSR vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNSR achieves a 44.93% return, which is significantly higher than DRIV's 42.27% return.
SNSR
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 19.62%
- YTD
- 44.93%
- 6M
- 43.21%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SNSR vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 44.93% | 6.46% | -0.45% | 23.06% | -25.50% | 23.66% | 35.05% | 47.90% | -19.96% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNSR and DRIV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SNSR and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNSR vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNSR
DRIV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
SNSR
DRIV
Industrials
SNSR
DRIV
Healthcare
SNSR
DRIV
-
Communication Services
SNSR
DRIV
Basic Materials
SNSR
DRIV
Utilities
SNSR
DRIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
SNSR
-
DRIV
Consumer Defensive
SNSR
-
DRIV
-
Energy
SNSR
-
DRIV
-
Financial Services
SNSR
-
DRIV
-
Real Estate
SNSR
-
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNSR vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
SNSR
DRIV
SNSR vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNSR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.55 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 6.92 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 24.10 | -13.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNSR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.70 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.35 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.54 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SNSR vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNSR drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNSR and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNSR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.46% | -41.93% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -13.43% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -34.18% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -41.93% | +3.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -1.04% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -15.13% | +5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 3.85% | +0.75% |
Volatility
SNSR vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) have volatilities of 9.35% and 9.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNSR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 9.36% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 19.29% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.90% | 25.14% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.16% | 27.07% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 27.40% | -2.73% |
SNSR vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SNSR and DRIV have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
SNSR vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
SNSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.82% | 0.43% | 0.21% | 1.12% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNSR and DRIV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to SNSR (9.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNSR dropped -38.46% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, SNSR leads with 9.51% vs 9.49% for DRIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SNSR has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SNSR and DRIV have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.37% for SNSR.
SNSR is categorized as Technology Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNSR and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer