PortfoliosLab logo
DRIV vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and LIT is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DRIV vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DRIV:

-0.33

LIT:

-0.51

Sortino Ratio

DRIV:

-0.36

LIT:

-0.62

Omega Ratio

DRIV:

0.96

LIT:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

DRIV:

-0.25

LIT:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

DRIV:

-0.93

LIT:

-1.09

Ulcer Index

DRIV:

11.11%

LIT:

15.63%

Daily Std Dev

DRIV:

28.04%

LIT:

32.77%

Max Drawdown

DRIV:

-41.93%

LIT:

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

DRIV:

-28.16%

LIT:

-61.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a -4.36% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -11.33% return.


DRIV

YTD

-4.36%

1M

5.83%

6M

-6.00%

1Y

-9.11%

3Y*

-2.72%

5Y*

11.43%

10Y*

N/A

LIT

YTD

-11.33%

1M

-1.31%

6M

-18.85%

1Y

-16.50%

3Y*

-20.32%

5Y*

5.65%

10Y*

5.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DRIV vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DRIV vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DRIV is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DRIV is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DRIV is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DRIV is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DRIV is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DRIV is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DRIV vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DRIV vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than LIT's 1.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
2.16%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.05%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and LIT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DRIV vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) have volatilities of 6.48% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...