SNPG vs. VUG
SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SNPG tracks the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPG returned 25.37%/yr vs 26.10%/yr for VUG. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SNPG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
SNPG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return.
SNPG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
SNPG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 11.36% | 18.22% | 33.99% | 38.45% | 1.81% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.78% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPG and VUG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SNPG and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNPG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPG
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
SNPG
VUG
Communication Services
SNPG
VUG
Financial Services
SNPG
VUG
Industrials
SNPG
VUG
Healthcare
SNPG
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
SNPG
VUG
Real Estate
SNPG
VUG
Basic Materials
SNPG
VUG
Consumer Defensive
SNPG
VUG
Energy
SNPG
VUG
Utilities
SNPG
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
SNPG
VUG
SNPG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.68 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 5.90 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.76 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.62 | +1.01 |
Drawdowns
SNPG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.69% | -50.68% | +28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -16.53% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.69% | -22.85% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.25% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -7.09% | +4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.71% | -1.56% |
Volatility
SNPG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.81%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 3.81% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 12.11% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 15.83% | -1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 22.21% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 21.44% | -3.44% |
SNPG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNPG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 0.46% | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.95% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SNPG and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SNPG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to VUG (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 26.10% vs 25.37% for SNPG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 26.10% return vs 25.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.
SNPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.03% for VUG.
SNPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPG and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer