PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPG vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPG achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 14.87% return.


SNPG

1D
0.28%
1M
10.61%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.71%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
25.29%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.31%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.92%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
28.58%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF
11.16%18.22%33.99%38.45%1.81%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.87%22.09%35.99%30.02%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and SPYG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.95

The correlation between SNPG and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNPG
SPYG

Technology

36.1%
51.9%

Communication Services

19.4%
16.8%

Financial Services

12.8%
8.5%

Industrials

10.5%
5.0%

Healthcare

9.6%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
8.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
1.0%

Energy

0.0%
0.1%

Utilities

0.0%
1.2%

Technology

SNPG
36.1%
SPYG
51.9%

Communication Services

SNPG
19.4%
SPYG
16.8%

Financial Services

SNPG
12.8%
SPYG
8.5%

Industrials

SNPG
10.5%
SPYG
5.0%

Healthcare

SNPG
9.6%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SNPG
9.4%
SPYG
8.9%

Real Estate

SNPG
2.2%
SPYG
0.6%

Basic Materials

SNPG
1.1%
SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

SNPG
0.0%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

SNPG
0.0%
SPYG
0.1%

Utilities

SNPG
0.0%
SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG
SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPGSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.27

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

3.07

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.71

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.90

11.22

-1.32

SNPG vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPGSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.27

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.36

+1.27

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPGSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-67.63%

+45.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-13.76%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-22.14%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-24.33%

+21.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.32%

-0.17%

Volatility

SNPG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.15%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPGSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.15%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

12.43%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

16.04%

-2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.17%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

20.65%

-2.64%

SNPG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNPG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, which matches SPYG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF
0.46%0.49%0.57%0.95%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNPG and SPYG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNPG has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to SPYG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 3-year performance, SPYG leads with 28.58% vs 25.29% for SNPG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 25.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.

SNPG and SPYG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.46%.

SNPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPG and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer