SNPG vs. PBUS
SNPG (Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SNPG tracks the S&P 500 Growth ESG Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNPG returned 25.37%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNPG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
SNPG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNPG having a 11.36% return and PBUS slightly lower at 11.31%.
SNPG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- 11.36%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 28.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.81%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SNPG vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 11.36% | 18.22% | 33.99% | 38.45% | 1.81% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 11.31% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNPG and PBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SNPG and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNPG vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNPG
PBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Technology
SNPG
PBUS
Communication Services
SNPG
PBUS
Financial Services
SNPG
PBUS
Industrials
SNPG
PBUS
Healthcare
SNPG
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
SNPG
PBUS
Real Estate
SNPG
PBUS
Basic Materials
SNPG
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
SNPG
PBUS
Energy
SNPG
PBUS
Utilities
SNPG
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNPG vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
SNPG
PBUS
SNPG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNPG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.13 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.43 | 14.18 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNPG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.34 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.80 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
SNPG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNPG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.69% | -33.15% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -9.02% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.69% | -19.07% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.21% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -5.13% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.99% | +1.16% |
Volatility
SNPG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNPG | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.88% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 9.13% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 12.06% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 17.05% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 19.33% | -1.33% |
SNPG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SNPG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
SNPG Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF | 0.46% | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.95% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SNPG and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SNPG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to PBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 3-year performance, SNPG leads with 25.37% vs 22.81% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 25.37% return vs 22.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.
PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.46% for SNPG.
SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.04% for PBUS.
PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNPG and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer