PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPG vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SNPG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SNPG having a 11.36% return and PBUS slightly lower at 11.31%.


SNPG

1D
0.56%
1M
9.28%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.71%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
10Y*

PBUS

1D
0.44%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.04%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNPG vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF
11.36%18.22%33.99%38.45%1.81%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
11.31%17.58%24.99%27.33%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SNPG and PBUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.93

The correlation between SNPG and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNPG vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SNPG
PBUS

Technology

36.1%
35.4%

Communication Services

19.4%
11.3%

Financial Services

12.8%
11.6%

Industrials

10.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.8%

Energy

0.0%
3.6%

Utilities

0.0%
2.3%

Technology

SNPG
36.1%
PBUS
35.4%

Communication Services

SNPG
19.4%
PBUS
11.3%

Financial Services

SNPG
12.8%
PBUS
11.6%

Industrials

SNPG
10.5%
PBUS
8.6%

Healthcare

SNPG
9.6%
PBUS
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SNPG
9.4%
PBUS
10.1%

Real Estate

SNPG
2.2%
PBUS
1.9%

Basic Materials

SNPG
1.1%
PBUS
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SNPG
0.0%
PBUS
4.8%

Energy

SNPG
0.0%
PBUS
3.6%

Utilities

SNPG
0.0%
PBUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNPG vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPG
SNPG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SNPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPG Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPGPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.13

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

14.18

-4.75

SNPG vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPG and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPGPBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.34

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

0.80

+0.83

Drawdowns

SNPG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPG drawdown since its inception was -21.69%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPG and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPGPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-33.15%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-9.02%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-19.07%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-5.13%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

1.99%

+1.16%

Volatility

SNPG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF (SNPG) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SNPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNPGPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

2.88%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

9.13%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

12.06%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

17.05%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

19.33%

-1.33%

SNPG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SNPG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

SNPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than PBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%
SNPG
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth ESG ETF
0.46%0.49%0.57%0.95%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SNPG and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SNPG has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to PBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNPG dropped -21.69% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 3-year performance, SNPG leads with 25.37% vs 22.81% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPG has performed better with a 25.37% return vs 22.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SNPG.

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.46% for SNPG.

SNPG tracks S&P 500 Growth ESG Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SNPG and 0.04% for PBUS.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNPG and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer