PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNPD vs. TMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SNPD vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SNPD vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.67%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%2.64%2.25%3.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNPD achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 4.14% return.


SNPD

1D
0.04%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.77%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
10Y*

TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SNPD vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SNPD vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNPD vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SNPDTMDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.35

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

0.61

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.49

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.01

1.42

+1.59

SNPD vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNPD and TMDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SNPDTMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.35

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.31

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between SNPD and TMDV is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SNPD vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

SNPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than TMDV's 2.63% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.11%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%

Drawdowns

SNPD vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNPD drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNPD and TMDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SNPDTMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-33.42%

+17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-10.52%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

-6.91%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-5.42%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.65%

-0.60%

Volatility

SNPD vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) is 3.57%, while ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that SNPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SNPDTMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

3.78%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

8.35%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

14.86%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

14.43%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

18.78%

-5.57%