SNOY vs. PBP
SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. SNOY is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past year, SNOY returned 12.02% vs 18.32% for PBP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNOY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.
Performance
SNOY vs. PBP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNOY achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 4.90% return.
SNOY
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- 59.59%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBP
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 6.44%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
SNOY vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | 9.89% | 30.66% | 21.03% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.90% | 8.49% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNOY and PBP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2024 | 0.35 |
The correlation between SNOY and PBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNOY vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank
SNOY
PBP
SNOY vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNOY | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.60 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 3.52 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 18.66 | -18.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNOY | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 2.68 | -2.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.35 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
SNOY vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNOY drawdown since its inception was -50.90%, which is greater than PBP's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNOY and PBP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNOY | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.90% | -43.43% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.90% | -5.22% | -45.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -0.17% | -10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -6.69% | -6.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.96% | 0.98% | +21.98% |
Volatility
SNOY vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a higher volatility of 34.27% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.93%. This indicates that SNOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNOY | PBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.27% | 0.93% | +33.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.74% | 5.53% | +43.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.40% | 6.87% | +50.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.26% | 11.86% | +40.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.26% | 13.66% | +38.60% |
SNOY vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNOY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNOY vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison
SNOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.63%, more than PBP's 11.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.16% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.63% | 84.96% | 33.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNOY and PBP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOY has higher volatility (34.27%) compared to PBP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNOY dropped -50.90% vs PBP's -43.43%.
On 1-year performance, PBP leads with 18.32% vs 12.02% for SNOY. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PBP has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 12.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SNOY.
SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 74.63%, compared with 11.16% for PBP.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SNOY and 0.29% for PBP.
PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNOY and PBP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer