SNDU vs. NVDQ

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

SNDU (T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNDU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the SanDisk Corporation (SNDK), while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. SNDU is passively managed, while NVDQ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. SNDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDQ.

Performance

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SNDU

• 1D: 6.28%
• 1M: -21.69%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDQ

• 1D: -7.98%
• 1M: -7.90%
• 6M: -37.88%
• YTD: -36.85%
• 1Y: -57.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF	461.44%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-32.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SNDU and NVDQ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	-0.32

Return for Risk

SNDU vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNDU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNDU	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.87	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.91	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.60	—

Drawdowns

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNDU drawdown since its inception was -56.44%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDU and NVDQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNDU	NVDQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.44%	-99.45%	+43.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-63.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.57%	-99.36%	+59.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.78%	-88.48%	+74.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	35.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SNDU	NVDQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	54.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	221.91%	70.54%	+151.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	221.91%	94.96%	+126.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	221.91%	94.96%	+126.95%

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDQ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNDU vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

SNDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.41%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNDU and NVDQ in my portfolio?

SNDU and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SNDU or NVDQ?

On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNDU or NVDQ?

NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNDU or NVDQ?

NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.00% for SNDU.

What is the main difference between SNDU and NVDQ?

SNDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNDU and 1.05% for NVDQ.