SNDU vs. ABNG
SNDU (T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SNDU is passively managed, while ABNG is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SNDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.
Performance
SNDU vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SNDU
- 1D
- 9.99%
- 1M
- 81.66%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -14.56%
- 6M
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNDU vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF | 616.94% |
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNDU and ABNG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNDU vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SNDU vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNDU drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNDU and ABNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNDU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -33.03% | -13.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.46% | +19.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -12.41% | +1.80% |
Volatility
SNDU vs. ABNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNDU | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 192.29% | 62.40% | +129.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 192.29% | 62.40% | +129.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 192.29% | 62.40% | +129.89% |
SNDU vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNDU vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SNDU nor ABNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SNDU and ABNG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.
SNDU and ABNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SNDU and 0.75% for ABNG.
Find the right allocation for SNDU and ABNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer