SNAV vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SNAV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Mohr Funds, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. SNAV is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 14.33%/yr vs 33.87%/yr for MTUM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

SNAV vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 32.00% return.

SNAV

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 14.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: -4.48%
• 1M: 8.74%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 6M: 29.92%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 33.87%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: 17.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAV vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	8.64%	15.54%	11.11%	12.29%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	32.00%	22.15%	32.89%	10.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAV and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2023	0.78

The correlation between SNAV and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SNAV vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SNAV	MTUM
Technology	46.0%	50.2%
Financial Services	9.6%	5.0%
Industrials	8.0%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	2.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	3.5%
Communication Services	6.9%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	3.7%
Energy	2.7%	10.5%
Utilities	2.6%	0.6%
Real Estate	2.6%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.3%

Return for Risk

SNAV vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAV

SNAV Risk / Return Rank: 62
SNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 64
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAV vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SNAV	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.92	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.53	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.64	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.85	13.91	-3.07

SNAV vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAV and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SNAV vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SNAV	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-34.08%	+17.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-11.54%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.61%	-20.99%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-4.48%	+1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-6.19%	+3.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	3.01%	-1.11%

Volatility

SNAV vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is 4.80%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that SNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SNAV	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	12.20%	-7.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.32%	19.44%	-11.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.35%	21.93%	-10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	21.15%	-7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.73%	21.31%	-7.58%

SNAV vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SNAV vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.56%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.94%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SNAV and MTUM in my portfolio?

SNAV and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SNAV or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to SNAV (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, SNAV or MTUM?

On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 33.87% vs 14.33% for SNAV. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNAV has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SNAV or MTUM?

Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 33.87% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SNAV or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SNAV or MTUM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.

What is the main difference between SNAV and MTUM?

SNAV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.