SNAV vs. IUS
SNAV (Mohr Sector Nav ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SNAV is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SNAV returned 15.83%/yr vs 20.93%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
SNAV vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SNAV achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.
SNAV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 12.32%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SNAV vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF | 12.32% | 15.54% | 11.11% | 12.25% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 15.71% | 16.94% | 16.51% | 16.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SNAV and IUS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SNAV and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SNAV vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SNAV
IUS
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SNAV
IUS
Financial Services
SNAV
IUS
Healthcare
SNAV
IUS
Industrials
SNAV
IUS
Consumer Cyclical
SNAV
IUS
Communication Services
SNAV
IUS
Consumer Defensive
SNAV
IUS
Energy
SNAV
IUS
Utilities
SNAV
IUS
Real Estate
SNAV
IUS
Basic Materials
SNAV
IUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SNAV vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
SNAV
IUS
SNAV vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SNAV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 3.26 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 4.53 | -1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.60 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 5.44 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 23.27 | -7.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SNAV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 3.26 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.85 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SNAV vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SNAV drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAV and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SNAV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -34.67% | +18.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -6.15% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.61% | -15.61% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -3.86% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.43% | +0.36% |
Volatility
SNAV vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that SNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SNAV | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.50% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 7.41% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.66% | 10.26% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 15.00% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 18.04% | -4.40% |
SNAV vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SNAV vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
SNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
SNAV Mohr Sector Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SNAV and IUS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNAV has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAV dropped -16.61% vs IUS's -34.67%.
On 3-year performance, IUS leads with 20.93% vs 15.83% for SNAV. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IUS has performed better with a 20.93% return vs 15.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SNAV.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for SNAV.
They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SNAV and 0.19% for IUS.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SNAV and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer