PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAP vs. LAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SNAP vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAP achieves a -34.82% return, which is significantly lower than LAC's 4.36% return.


SNAP

1D
-1.31%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
-34.82%
6M
-28.04%
1Y
-33.75%
3Y*
-20.12%
5Y*
-39.35%
10Y*

LAC

1D
3.17%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
4.36%
6M
-11.13%
1Y
71.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAP vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SNAP
Snap Inc.
-34.82%-25.07%-36.39%90.01%
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.36%46.80%-53.59%-27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAP and LAC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SNAP:

$8.88B

LAC:

$1.61B

EPS

SNAP:

-$0.24

LAC:

-$0.28

PB Ratio

SNAP:

4.26

LAC:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

SNAP:

$6.10B

LAC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

SNAP:

$3.40B

LAC:

-$580.22K

EBITDA (TTM)

SNAP:

-$173.71M

LAC:

-$52.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAP vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAP
SNAP Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SNAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LAC
LAC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAP vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAPLACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.25

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.16

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

1.77

-2.83

SNAP vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAP Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAP and LAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAP vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and LAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAPLACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.27%

-81.83%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.03%

-63.08%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.67%

-61.18%

-32.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.04%

-63.13%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.45%

41.47%

-7.02%

Volatility

SNAP vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Snap Inc. (SNAP) is 12.67%, while Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a volatility of 22.78%. This indicates that SNAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAPLACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.67%

22.78%

-10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.17%

53.55%

-12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.41%

132.17%

-76.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.96%

101.55%

-25.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.73%

101.55%

-29.82%

Dividends

SNAP vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither SNAP nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SNAP vs. LAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Snap Inc. and Lithium Americas Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.53B
0
(SNAP) Total Revenue
(LAC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAP and LAC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAC has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to SNAP (12.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs LAC's -81.83%.

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAP and LAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer