PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SNAP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Snap Inc. (SNAP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SNAP achieves a -44.73% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.


SNAP

1D
-3.67%
1M
-22.03%
YTD
-44.73%
6M
-42.89%
1Y
-43.62%
3Y*
-25.58%
5Y*
-41.95%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SNAP
Snap Inc.
-44.73%-25.07%-36.39%89.16%-80.97%-6.07%206.61%196.37%-62.29%-39.12%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SNAP and ^GSPC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017

0.45

The correlation between SNAP and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SNAP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNAP
SNAP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SNAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SNAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Snap Inc. (SNAP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SNAP^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.32

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

2.46

-3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

10.92

-12.15

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SNAP Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SNAP and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SNAP drawdown since its inception was -95.27%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SNAP and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SNAP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.27%

-56.78%

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.03%

-9.10%

-52.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.48%

-18.90%

-58.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.27%

-25.43%

-69.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.63%

-3.21%

-91.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.13%

-10.71%

-49.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.40%

2.04%

+33.36%

Volatility

SNAP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Snap Inc. (SNAP) has a higher volatility of 18.94% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.89%. This indicates that SNAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SNAP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.94%

4.89%

+14.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.65%

9.93%

+33.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.12%

12.57%

+44.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.26%

17.00%

+59.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.82%

18.08%

+53.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SNAP and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNAP has higher volatility (18.94%) compared to ^GSPC (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SNAP dropped -95.27% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SNAP and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer