SMYY vs. BCFS.DE
SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) and BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) are both Options Trading funds. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BCFS.DE.
Performance
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMYY is traded in USD, while BCFS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BCFS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMYY achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than BCFS.DE's 2.78% return.
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFS.DE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 6.70% | -27.52% |
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 2.78% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMYY and BCFS.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY) and UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMYY | BCFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.98 | 1.44 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMYY drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than BCFS.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMYY and BCFS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMYY | BCFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | -5.12% | -31.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.74% | -0.90% | -27.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.15% | -0.99% | -24.16% |
Volatility
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMYY | BCFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 7.76% | +24.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 7.76% | +24.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.69% | 7.76% | +24.93% |
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFS.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMYY vs. BCFS.DE - Dividend Comparison
SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%, while BCFS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 146.89% | 53.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMYY and BCFS.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFS.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SMYY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for SMYY and 0.24% for BCFS.DE.
Find the right allocation for SMYY and BCFS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer