BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE
BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) and UBUD.DE (UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFS.DE is a Options Trading fund tracking the US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while UBUD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFS.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for UBUD.DE.
Performance
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than UBUD.DE's -6.35% return.
BCFS.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBUD.DE
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- -6.35%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 49.43%
- 3Y*
- 42.21%
- 5Y*
- 24.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 4.05% | 4.64% |
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | -6.35% | 69.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFS.DE and UBUD.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFS.DE
UBUD.DE
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFS.DE | UBUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.96 | 0.26 | +2.70 |
Drawdowns
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum UBUD.DE drawdown of -57.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and UBUD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFS.DE | UBUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -57.79% | +55.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -27.13% | +26.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -28.07% | +27.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.62% | — |
Volatility
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFS.DE | UBUD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 45.66% | -42.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 35.68% | -32.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 35.59% | -31.93% |
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than UBUD.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFS.DE vs. UBUD.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBUD.DE UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 0.59% | 0.40% | 0.56% | 1.74% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 0.44% | 0.42% | 0.48% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFS.DE and UBUD.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCFS.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.
BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while UBUD.DE is Precious Metals. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.43% for UBUD.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFS.DE and UBUD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer